Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Diabetic Retinopathy Severity on Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiography versus Color Photography and Association with Risk of Disease Worsening

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
8Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Purpose To evaluate the potential benefits of ultra-widefield (UWF) fluorescein angiography (FA) versus color photography in assessing the risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) worsening. Design Exploratory analysis of a longitudinal observational study (Protocol AA). Participants Participants with ≥1 eye having nonproliferative DR at baseline. Methods For each UWF-color and UWF-FA image, the extent and severity of DR lesions within the ETDRS 7-field area ("masked") and the full image area ("unmasked") were determined. Diabetic retinopathy severity levels were graded for each combination of modality and masking condition using the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS). Associations between baseline UWF-color and UWF-FA DR severity with disease worsening were evaluated and compared. Main Outcome Measures Disease worsening over 4 years, defined as ≥2-step DRSS worsening on masked UWF-color or receipt of DR treatment. Results Among the 768 eyes, DRSS agreement between masked UWF-color versus masked or unmasked UWF-FA at each visit was fair to moderate (range for κ: 0.34–0.53). Ultra-widefield FA identified more severe DR than masked UWF-color in 57% of the masked UWF-FA images and 62% of the unmasked. Over 4 years, disease worsening was more common in eyes with a more severe grade on masked UWF-FA than masked UWF-color for hemorrhages and/or microaneurysms (47% vs. 37%; P = 0.04), intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMA) (50% vs. 36%; P = 0.007), and new vessels/neovascularization elsewhere (NVE) (57% vs. 39%; P < 0.003), and on unmasked UWF-FA for IRMA (49% vs. 35%; P = 0.008) and NVE (58% vs. 38%; P < 0.001). A greater risk of disease worsening was also associated with more severe DRSS level on masked (50% vs. 30%; P < 0.001) and on unmasked (50% vs. 28%; P < 0.001) UWF-FA compared with masked UWF-color. Conclusions This analysis highlights important differences between UWF-color and UWF-FA in assessing DR severity and predicting disease progression over time. Ultra-widefield FA appears to offer a more accurate risk assessment of future DR worsening. These findings support the integration of UWF-FA findings into the existing grading scales and the development of supplemental DRSS grading criteria that incorporate the additional prognostic information provided by angiographic imaging. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity on Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiography versus Color Photography and Association with Risk of Disease Worsening
Date Crossref
01/06/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and AnalysisRetinal and Optic Conditions

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.