Tracking tau and cellular responses in human iPSC‐microglia: from uptake to seedable secretion, including in extracellular vesicles
Rattachement africain : gb, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Microglia have been implicated in the templated spread of tau aggregates in tauopathies through mouse studies. However, it is unclear whether these findings translate to human disease. METHODS: We challenged human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived microglia-like-cells (iMGL) with monomeric and fibrillar recombinant tau and tau purified from Alzheimer's patient brains, examining in detail the uptake, processing, release, and seeding of tau by microglia. RESULTS: iMGL take up tau via lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP)1 and heparan sulfate proteoglycans, with leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 affecting LRP1 trafficking. Monomeric tau is digested effectively with minimal effects on iMGL, but recombinant or brain-derived tau fibrils induce chemokine/interferon response subtypes, alongside downregulation of homeostatic genes. Fibrillar tau is degradation-resistant, can escape into the cytoplasm, and becomes phosphorylated on two specific residues. iMGL release partially digested fibrillar tau, including in extracellular vesicles, visualized by cryo-electron microscopy, that seed aggregation in neurons. DISCUSSION: Our study reveals new insights into human microglial responses to tau, highlighting opportunities to limit pathogenic tau spread.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Tracking tau and cellular responses in human iPSC‐microglia: from uptake to seedable secretion, including in extracellular vesicles
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.