Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Behavioural nudges to reduce low-value care for low back pain in the emergency department (NUDG-ED): a 2 × 2 factorial, pragmatic cluster randomized trial

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Background: Low-value care exposes patients to unnecessary risk and wastes scarce health resources. We aimed to determine if patient- or clinician-directed nudges could reduce low-value care for low back pain in the emergency department. Methods: We conducted a 2 × 2 factorial, cluster randomized controlled trial involving patients with low back pain presenting to emergency departments. Eight emergency departments were randomized to receive patient nudges (6 electronic information posters discouraging unnecessary imaging and opioids, displayed on 55-inch screens in waiting rooms), clinician nudges (3 electronic health record alerts that provided indications for lumbar spine imaging and suggested alternatives to opioids), both patient and clinician nudges, or no nudges. The primary outcome was the proportion of encounters for low back pain with low-value care, defined as non-indicated lumbar spine imaging test, opioid prescription at discharge, or both. We calculated odds ratios (ORs), adjusted for baseline and clustering. Results: There were 3770 encounters for low back pain during the study period. The overall baseline prevalence of low-value care was 41.6%. During the intervention period, the proportion of encounters with low-value care reduced to 36.4% with patient nudges versus 38.1% without, but the difference was not significant (adjusted OR 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 to 1.27). The proportion of encounters with low-value care was 39.4% with clinician nudges versus 35.0% without (adjusted OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.05). We did not observe an interaction effect between the interventions (p = 0.4). The patient nudge may have reduced strong beliefs among patients in the value of imaging for low back pain. We found no important differences in secondary outcomes. Interpretation: Nudges — including waiting room information posters targeting patients and electronic health record alerts targeting clinicians — did not reduce low-value care in emergency departments. Trial registration: www.anzctr.org.au,ACTRN12623001000695

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Behavioural nudges to reduce low-value care for low back pain in the emergency department (NUDG-ED): a 2 × 2 factorial, pragmatic cluster randomized trial
Date Crossref
05/04/2026
Éditeur
CMA Impact Inc.
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Healthcare cost, quality, practicesCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsHealthcare and Environmental Waste Management

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.