Brain Functional Connectivity Signatures of Craving Across Substance Use Disorders: A Transdiagnostic Approach
Rattachement africain : de, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Craving is a hallmark feature of substance use disorders (SUDs) and a major risk factor for relapse, yet reliable biomarkers that enable individual-level prediction remain scarce. Here, we applied connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) to resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data in a transdiagnostic sample of individuals with cannabis, opioid, or tobacco use disorder ( n = 78). Using CPM, we identified a distributed functional brain network that reliably predicted self-reported craving. Computational lesion analyses revealed key contributions from the right medial orbitofrontal cortex, right dorsal posterior cingulate cortex, and left lateral medial frontal gyrus. Importantly, the craving network generalized across two independent datasets. In alcohol-dependent patients ( n = 41 ), the identified craving network, along with its positive and negative subnetworks, predicted distinct cognitive and motivational components of craving. In a second external dataset of smokers ( n = 28), the craving network predicted both nicotine craving after abstinence as well as intra-individual changes in craving between sated and craving states. Together, these findings provide evidence for a robust, transdiagnostic craving signature in SUDs. Future work should assess the network’s predictive utility for longitudinal outcomes such as relapse risk and treatment response.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Brain Functional Connectivity Signatures of Craving Across Substance Use Disorders: A Transdiagnostic Approach
- Date Crossref
- 06/04/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.