Blood–Brain Barrier (BBB)-Penetrable Androgen Receptor (AR) Degrader as a Potential Therapeutic Agent for Glioblastoma
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Androgen receptor (AR) contributes to the progression of glioblastoma (GBM), which is consistent with the sex difference in GBM, which has a higher incidence in males than in females. Therefore, targeting AR is a potential therapeutic approach for GBM treatment. However, AR mutation commonly occurs in GBM, which makes conventional AR antagonists less effective. AR degraders abolish AR at the protein level regardless of the mutation status of AR, which makes it a better strategy in GBM. Compound A is an analog of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor Nimesulide. Mechanistically, compound A targets HSP27, disrupts the HSP27-AR complex, and thereby promotes AR degradation in GBM cells at 1 μM, leading to inhibition of AR-overexpressing GBM cell growth with IC 50 s around 0.2 μM. In a GBM patient-derived cell line, DI318, compound A (1 μΜ) also significantly decreases AR protein levels. The compound significantly inhibits GBM xenograft growth at 20 mg/kg and does not cause toxicity in mice up to 200 mg/kg. Pharmacokinetic studies reveal that compound A has a half-life ( t 1/2 ) of 3.11 h and a BBB penetration of 52%, which is even higher than the standard chemotherapy Temozolomide. These results suggest that the AR degrader has great potential as a novel GBM treatment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Blood–Brain Barrier (BBB)-Penetrable Androgen Receptor (AR) Degrader as a Potential Therapeutic Agent for Glioblastoma
- Date Crossref
- 06/04/2026
- Éditeur
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.