Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Regulatory Interactions and Learnings-RADIAL the Trials@Home Proof-of-Concept Trial on Decentralization

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

This paper is part of a series of six publications presenting lessons learned during the setup, regulatory submission, and conduct of the proof-of-concept Trials@Home RADIAL trial. The three-arm RADIAL trial, comprising fully decentralized, hybrid, and conventional arms, is the first clinical study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of decentralized clinical trial elements across six European countries. In this paper, insights from multiple formal regulatory interactions related to the RADIAL trial, conducted between 2021 and 2022, are presented. These interactions included (i) a consultation with the European Medicines Agency's Innovation Task Force, (ii) a national Scientific Advice procedure, and (iii) the clinical trial application submission under the EU Clinical Trials Regulation (Regulation EU 536/2014). Given the novelty of the decentralized approach and lack of guidelines, many constructive comments and questions were received that supported the finalization of the protocol and conduct of the trial. It is important to acknowledge that clinical trials often span multiple countries and regulatory jurisdictions, creating complexity due to variations in complementary national legal and regulatory requirements. We conclude that early and continuous regulatory engagement is essential for the successful implementation of innovative trial designs. Although progress has been made in supporting decentralized clinical trials, persistent challenges related to legislative heterogeneity remain. Harmonized regulatory guidance and greater transparency through the sharing of regulatory experiences will be key to facilitating the broader adoption of decentralized approaches and advancing clinical trials in Europe.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

Aucun DOI disponible pour le contrôle Crossref.

Les sujets associés

Biomedical Ethics and RegulationEthics in Clinical ResearchStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.