Neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI chemotherapy with or without camrelizumab in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is associated with significant toxicity and limited pathological responses. We retrospectively compared a radiotherapy‑free regimen of camrelizumab plus modified FOLFOXIRI versus modified FOLFOXIRI alone in consecutive patients with clinical stage II-III LARC treated from 2022-2025 (n = 146). All patients received ≥3 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy; surgery or watch‑and‑wait was determined by a multidisciplinary team. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Among surgical patients, pCR rates were 29.8% with camrelizumab plus FOLFOXIRI and 19.6% with FOLFOXIRI alone. Radiologic objective response rates were 70.7% and 53.5%, respectively, and mean neoadjuvant rectal scores were lower with camrelizumab (13.95 vs 23.77; P < 0.02). Disease‑free survival was significantly improved in the camrelizumab group, while overall survival was similar at current follow‑up. Grade 3-4 hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities were comparable, and no unexpected immune‑related events occurred. Camrelizumab plus FOLFOXIRI appears to be an active, tolerable radiotherapy‑free neoadjuvant option for LARC.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI chemotherapy with or without camrelizumab in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study
- Date Crossref
- 04/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.