Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae lineage CG307 displays urinary tract tropism
Rattachement africain : us, cy. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Carbapenem-resistant (CR) Klebsiella pneumoniae ( Kp ) are designated by the WHO as a top-priority pathogen due to their antibiotic resistance profiles, capacity to disseminate resistance, and associated mortality. The prototypical CR Kp clade, CG258, is associated with acute respiratory infections; however, urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by CR Kp are increasing, and frequently linked to the emergent clade CG307. Notably, CG307 isolates have extensive accessory genomes that may drive adaptation to the urinary tract, including a novel capsule gene cluster and high-affinity urea transporter. In this study, we show that UTIs caused by Kp are increasing across the Southern US and that in addition to CG307s circulating within Houston, TX hospital systems, the lineage was also detected in healthcare systems in the broader Gulf Coast region. Characterization of CG307 isolates demonstrate that while these strains exhibit similar mucoviscosity compared to the reference UTI strain TOP52, the lineage displays significantly higher i) growth in artificial urine, ii) urease activity, and iii) UTI in a mouse model. These results suggest that CG307 is spreading across the Southern US and encodes distinct pathogenic features that promote urinary tract tropism, underscoring a need for targeted surveillance and future studies that mechanistically examine the factors that promote UTI.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Carbapenem-resistant <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> lineage CG307 displays urinary tract tropism
- Date Crossref
- 04/04/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.