Compost‐Based Organic Amendments and Synthetic Fertilisers Enhance Soil Health and Crop Yield Worldwide
Résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Fertiliser management is central to achieving sustainable increases in crop productivity while maintaining soil health. Yet, it remains unclear how chemical fertilisers, organic amendments (OAs), or their combination have comparable effects on soil health at a global scale. Here we synthesise 1657 observations from 204 published studies to assess the effects of compost (COM)‐based organic amendments, synthetic fertiliser (NPK), and their combination (COM + NPK; partial replacement) on crop yield and multiple soil health indicators. All treatments significantly increased yield, with the strongest increase under COM + NPK (62.6%), followed by COM (45.1%) and NPK (26.7%). Yield responses were crop‐dependent, with vegetables and legumes showing the largest benefits under organic‐based fertilisation (COM and COM + NPK). We found that COM + NPK most strongly improved soil health by increasing total carbon, nitrogen, and available nutrients, thereby enhancing organic matter retention and nutrient cycling. Moreover, COM alone produced the largest gains in soil organic carbon and microbial diversity, especially bacterial richness. In contrast, NPK had limited effects on total phosphorus, soil organic carbon and respiration. Together, our findings show that organic fertilisation strategies alone or combined with mineral fertilisers can simultaneously sustain yields and soil health, providing a practical route toward more resilient and sustainable agricultural systems worldwide.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Compost‐Based Organic Amendments and Synthetic Fertilisers Enhance Soil Health and Crop Yield Worldwide
- Date Crossref
- 04/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.