Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Minimally Invasive vs Open Left Pancreatectomy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Long-Term Results of the Randomized DIPLOMA Trial

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Importance: The DIPLOMA trial showed comparable radical resection rates after minimally invasive left pancreatectomy (MILP) and open left pancreatectomy (OLP) in patients with upfront resectable pancreatic cancer. Data on long-term overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) are currently lacking, but are required before the oncological efficacy of MILP can be confirmed. Objective: To determine the long-term oncological outcome, including OS and DFS, of MILP vs OLP in patients with upfront resectable left-sided pancreatic cancer in the DIPLOMA trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: The randomized, patient-blinded and pathologist-blinded DIPLOMA trial was conducted between 2018 and 2021, with a follow-up duration of at least 36 months. It was a multicenter international trial that took place in 35 centers in 12 countries worldwide. Patients with upfront resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas were included. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to undergo MILP (laparoscopic and robotic) or OLP. Patients were blinded for the surgical approach. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes included OS and DFS. Other outcomes include receipt of adjuvant therapy and time to start of adjuvant therapy. Results: Between May 2018 and May 2021, 258 patients were randomized to the MILP (131 patients) and OLP (127 patients) groups. After a median follow-up of 38 (IQR 36-46) months, 134 patients (52%) had died and 127 patients (55%) experienced disease recurrence. OS did not differ significantly between the MILP and OLP groups (median, 32 vs 34 months; stratified hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.72-1.44; P =.92). Also, DFS did not significantly differ between the MILP and OLP groups (median, 21 vs 17 months; stratified hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.68-1.35; P =.81). Adjuvant therapy was administered in 79 patients after MILP (79 of 113 [70%]) and 79 patients after OLP (79 of 110 [72%]) (P =.63). Time to adjuvant therapy was comparable between groups (median 59 vs 56 days; P =.92). Conclusions and Relevance: In this long-term follow-up of the randomized DIPLOMA trial in patients with upfront resectable pancreatic cancer, oncological outcomes after MILP and OLP did not differ significantly, confirming the oncological safety of MILP.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

Aucun DOI disponible pour le contrôle Crossref.

Les sujets associés

Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchPancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.