Abstract 7656: Comprehensive investigation of stool metaproteomes among patients with precancerous lesions and colorectal cancer.
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the 2nd most fatal cancer in the U.S.; most benefits of CRC screening are from detection of advanced pre-cancerous lesions (APLs). With a goal to improve non-invasive stool test APL sensitivity, we sought novel APL signatures in stool metaproteomes (host- and gut microbiome-derived proteins) among cancer-free controls (CTRL), APL, and CRC patients. Since dysbiosis in gut microbiota is associated with CRC initiation, we also examined the microbial source of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). METHODS: Mass spectrometry was performed on archival stool supernatants (n=63 patients; 15 CTRL, 32 APL [16 adenomas & 16 sessile serrated lesions], 16 CRC). A sectioning and database-enrichment strategy was applied for peptide-spectrum matching. Microbial and human-derived proteins were searched against the Integrated Gene Catalogue (IGC) and UniProt human reference proteome. DEPs were identified using thresholds of P < 0.05 and fold-change ≥ 1.5. Pathway annotation of human DEPs was performed with the REVIGO webserver, while gut microbial DEPs were functionally categorized using the KEGG Automatic Annotation Server (KAAS). To assess the taxonomic distribution of microbial DEPs, sequences were aligned against the NCBI non-redundant database using BLASTP. RESULTS: Mass spectrometry detected 879 human and 32,514 microbiome-derived proteins. When limiting detection to proteins present in ≥ 75% of patients, only 117 human and 204 microbial proteins remained. There were 17 (4,875), 288 (9,638), and 63 (3,053) unique human (microbial) proteins detected in CTRL, APL, and CRC groups, respectively. When the protein presence cutoff was set at >30% of patients, there were 52 (13 human [11 upregulated, 2 downregulated], 39 microbial [28 upregulated, 11 downregulated]) DEPs detected for the CRC + APL vs CTRL comparison. Some pathways associated with upregulated human DEPs included: inflammatory response, cellular response to iron, and endothelial cell migration. The top upregulated microbial DEPs were derived from the Phocaeicola, Lachnospiraceae, and Oscillospiraceae genera. The top downregulated microbial DEPs belonged to the Bacteroides, Eubacterium, Agathobacter, Coprococcus, and Blautia genera. CONCLUSION: This work highlights the biological diversity and molecular heterogeneity of the stool proteome. We identified several host and microbial protein markers that differentiate APLs and early CRC from controls. These results provide a foundation for future validation studies, which are necessary to determine the clinical utility of these protein biomarkers prior to their integration into a noninvasive stool test. Citation Format: Emmalee J. Northrop-Albrecht, Vinod K. Gupta, William R. Taylor, Jason P. Sinnwell, Doug W. Mahoney, Patrick H. Foote, Kelli N. Burger, Jaeyun Sung, John B. Kisiel, . Comprehensive investigation of stool metaproteomes among patients with precancerous lesions and colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 7656.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Abstract 7656: Comprehensive investigation of stool metaproteomes among patients with precancerous lesions and colorectal cancer.
- Date Crossref
- 03/04/2026
- Éditeur
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.