Identification of platelet-derived biomarker in a cohort of Parkinson's disease
Rattachement africain : cn, th. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Evidence has suggested that platelets (PLTs) share biochemical properties with neurons. However, whether PLTs might serve as biomarkers of Parkinson's disease (PD) remains uncertain. In this study, we first analyzed RNA data from a publicly available microarray of the substantia nigra (SN) and RNA-seq data from the PLTs of newly recruited PD patients using weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA). We found that in the SN, the majority of network modules were associated with chromatin organization, energy metabolism, and synaptic signaling, whereas those in the PLTs were related to chromatin organization and DNA metabolism. Potential PLT biomarkers were then screened by comparing the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the significant module pathways with those identified in the SN data by microarray. Additionally, significant genes were identified using genome-wide association study (GWAS) and transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS). The resulting 20 candidate genes were further tested for consistency in single-cell RNA-seq data, followed by assessment using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis and qPCR validation. The combination of the CRLF3 and LRRC37A2 genes exhibited the best diagnostic performance. Collectively, both PLTs and the SN were common in the chromatin organization pathway, and the diagnostic value of PLT-derived CRLF3 and LRRC37A2 genes deserves further large-scale studies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Identification of platelet-derived biomarker in a cohort of Parkinson's disease
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.