Short and long-term health consequences of the 2013 Sarin attack in Ghouta, Syria: a retrospective descriptive study of civilian survivors

Le résumé fourni par la source

On August 21, 2013, sarin gas was used as a weapon of war in multiple areas of Ghouta, rural Damascus, Syria, in the largest confirmed chemical weapons attack against civilians in the 21st century. Despite the scale of the attack, little is known about the long-term medical symptoms experienced by survivors. This study documents the lived experiences and the short- and long-term physical and psychological consequences of sarin exposure among civilian survivors more than a decade after the attack. We conducted a retrospective qualitative descriptive study using thematic analysis based on semi-structured narrative interviews with survivors of the 2013 Ghouta chemical attacks. Participants were selected based on confirmed exposure and willingness to provide detailed accounts of their health status, experiences, and healthcare-seeking behavior. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurrent patterns and outcomes across different domains. Participants reported several medical symptoms ranging in severity, including chronic respiratory issues, neurological complaints, fatigue, and sensory disturbances. The psychological impact was universal, with widespread reports of anxiety, nightmares, panic attacks, and social withdrawal. Most participants experienced significant disruption to their quality of life and described barriers to accessing healthcare. The long-term consequences of sarin exposure in Ghouta extend far beyond the initial event, affecting nearly every aspect of survivors' lives. These findings suggest a substantial long-term burden of self-reported physical and psychological symptoms among survivors. They highlight the need for sustained medical, psychological, and social support, and underscore the importance of integrating survivor perspectives into post-conflict recovery and health system responses.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.