Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Immediate versus staged complete revascularization using drug-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease: An updated meta-analysis after the OPTION-STEMI trial

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization is recommended for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease. However, the optimal timing of non-culprit lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial, ranging from treatment during the initial procedure to several weeks after the acute event. AIMS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE through September 2025 for randomized controlled trials comparing immediate vs. staged complete revascularization with drug-eluting stents in patients presenting with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing primary PCI. METHODS: The primary endpoint was death from cardiac causes at a median follow-up of 12 months. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), any unplanned revascularization, target-vessel revascularization, target-lesion revascularization, major bleeding, acute kidney injury, and stroke. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials including 2837 patients (1441 immediate and 1446 staged) were analyzed. At 12 months, death from cardiac cause occurred at comparable rates between strategies (risk ratio [RR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.01; P = 0.33). No significant differences were observed for all-cause mortality (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00; P = 0.13), non-fatal MI (RR. 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.04; P = 0.17), target vessel revascularization (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.01; P = 0.48), or target lesion revascularization (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.02; P = 0.34). Similarly, no differences were found for stroke (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.01; P = 0.75), major bleeding (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.03; P = 0.21), or AKI (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.03; P = 0.79). Immediate complete revascularization may be associated with a trend towards lower rates of unplanned revascularization compared with staged PCI (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93-1.01; P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary disease, an immediate complete revascularization strategy showed comparable rates of death from cardiac cause and non-fatal MI as compared with staged complete revascularization at a median of 12 months of follow-up.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Immediate versus staged complete revascularization using drug-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease: An updated meta-analysis after the OPTION-STEMI trial
Date Crossref
30/04/2026
Éditeur
Polskie Towarzystwo Kardiologiczne
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Coronary Interventions and DiagnosticsCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCoronary Artery Anomalies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.