Chemical Analysis and Biological Activities of Senecio scandens Essential Oil: An Experimental and In Silico Study
Résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT The study first describes chemical profiles of essential oils from Vietnamese Senecio scandens Buch.‐Ham. ex D. Don. From the gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) analysis, the stem bark essential oil was characterized by the major compounds β ‐myrcene (19.7%), ( E )‐ β‐ ocimene (9.5%), and limonene (5.4%), while the leaf essential oil was dominated by trans‐cadina‐1(6),4‐diene (11.0%), caryophyllene oxide (10.9%), (E)‐caryophyllene (9.0%) , α ‐humulene (6.9%), germacrene D (6.8%), β ‐myrcene (6.7%), and cis‐isolongifolanone (6.7%). The essential oils from the stem barks (IC 50 = 8.75 ± 0.42 µg/mL) and leaves (IC 50 = 12.40 ± 0.56 µg/mL) surpassed the standard allopurinol (IC 50 = 14.7 ± 0.71 µg/mL) in the xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibitory activity. Additionally, they showed strong cytotoxic, antioxidant, and anti‐inflammatory activities with IC 50 values of 18.2–42.8 µg/mL. The stem bark sample further strongly inhibited the bacterium Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778 with the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 64 µg/mL. In general, the stem bark essential oil consistently demonstrated stronger potency than the leaf essential oil. Molecular docking studies further supported that germacrene D, trans ‐cadina‐1(6),4‐diene, ( E )‐caryophyllene, and α ‐humulene exhibited stronger binding affinities with the XO than the reference ligand guanine. These interactions were primarily mediated by hydrophobic contacts with key residues, with germacrene D and trans ‐cadina‐1(6),4‐diene emerging as the most potent inhibitors.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Chemical Analysis and Biological Activities of <i>Senecio scandens</i> Essential Oil: An Experimental and In Silico Study
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.