Passing Word Line Row Hammering in DRAM via AI-Assisted Pi-BCAT Structure
Rattachement africain : kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
We present a device-level analysis of a passing wordline induced disturbance mechanism in scaled DRAM arrays, referred to as Passing Word Line Row Hammering Effect (PWL RHE). The disturbance is driven by repeated switching of passing word lines in dense cell layouts, which introduces strong electrostatic coupling to adjacent storage nodes. Using TCAD-based transient simulations under representative operating biases with floating storage conditions, we observe pronounced node-voltage excursions during PWL transitions. The disturbance is further amplified by charge trapping/de-trapping in isolation-related interface regions, resulting in node deviations that exceed those of conventional row-hammer conditions by orders of magnitude. To reduce the computational burden associated with long transient cycling, a prediction-guided screening flow is incorporated to preselect high-risk coupling cases and avoid redundant simulation sweeps. With this accelerated methodology, an enhanced BCATbased architecture (Pi-BCAT) is shown to significantly suppress PWL-induced node fluctuations compared with a baseline BCAT design, consistent with improved carrier transport control and reduced leakage-sensitive paths. This hybrid framework, combining physics-based TCAD analysis and prediction-assisted exploration, provides a scalable approach for evaluating disturbance-driven degradation and mitigation concepts in next-generation DRAM reliability research.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Passing Word Line Row Hammering in DRAM via AI-Assisted Pi-BCAT Structure
- Date Crossref
- 24/02/2026
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.