Loss of GPRC5D enhances the proliferative capacity and competitive fitness of myeloma upon anti-GPRC5D immunotherapy
Rattachement africain : de, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Immunotherapies targeting surface antigens have transformed the treatment landscape of multiple myeloma (MM), with GPRC5D emerging as a promising therapeutic target. Monoallelic loss of GPRC5D is frequently observed in newly diagnosed MM patients, and the incidence of acquired GPRC5D alterations increases following exposure to GPRC5D-directed therapies. However, the functional consequences of both baseline monoallelic and therapy-induced biallelic GPRC5D alterations remain poorly understood. In this study, we modeled monoallelic versus biallelic loss of GPRC5D to investigate their impact on MM cell biology and responsiveness to GPRC5D-targeted immunotherapies. Our results demonstrate that monoallelic GPRC5D loss in OPM-2 cells reduces surface expression of the antigen and confers resistance to GPRC5D-directed therapies. Complete loss of GPRC5D alters the transcriptional state of MM cells and promotes reprogramming of the phosphoproteomic circuitry ultimately resulting in a pro-proliferative chemokine environment. As a result, GPRC5D deficiency increases the basal proliferation rate of MM cells thereby providing a competitive advantage which may further be amplified by selecting these aggressive phenotypes during ongoing treatment with anti-GPRC5D immunotherapies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Loss of GPRC5D enhances the proliferative capacity and competitive fitness of myeloma upon anti-GPRC5D immunotherapy
- Date Crossref
- 31/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.