Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Factors contributing to surgical complexity in giant parasagittal and falcine meningiomas: a case-based review

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : id. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Giant parasagittal and falcine meningiomas are surgically challenging due to their frequent involvement of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS), proximity to eloquent cortex, and complex venous anatomy. Although these tumors carry a high operative risk, detailed analyses of surgical difficulty remain limited in the literature. Objective: This narrative review of published case reports and series aims to delineate the key determinants of surgical complexity in giant parasagittal and falcine meningiomas, including tumor size, sinus involvement, anatomical constraints, and intraoperative decision-making while emphasizing the balance between surgical radicality and patient safety. Methods: A narrative review and multicase synthesis were performed, analyzing 22 published reports (19 case reports and 3 case series) describing the microsurgical management of giant parasagittal and falcine meningiomas. Studies were included based on the PICOS framework, focusing on tumors ≥5 cm with original surgical and outcome data. Extracted variables included demographics, tumor size, location, SSS involvement, histology, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 36 patients were identified. Most tumors were parasagittal (52.8%), involved the middle third of the SSS (38.9%), and demonstrated SSS invasion (78.6%), with complete occlusion in 64.3% of cases. Gross total resection was achieved in 75.7% of cases. Pediatric patients (11.1%) were more frequently associated with high-grade histology and intraoperative complications. Tumors involving the middle third of the SSS and those with parasagittal location were consistently associated with increased technical difficulty, venous bleeding, and postoperative deficits. Overall, 72.2% of patients experienced favorable recovery, while 11.1% had poor outcomes, including tumor recurrence or death. Conclusion: Surgical management of giant parasagittal and falcine meningiomas is technically demanding, particularly in pediatric cases and when tumors involve the parasagittal region or the middle third of the SSS. Careful preoperative venous evaluation and individualized strategies are crucial for optimizing the resection while minimizing complications.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Factors contributing to surgical complexity in giant parasagittal and falcine meningiomas: a case-based review
Date Crossref
29/03/2026
Éditeur
Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • University of Brawijaya pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Faculty of Medicine Department of Surgery pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

University of Brawijaya et Department of Surgery — Faculty of Medicine.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Meningioma and schwannoma managementNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma CasesPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.