Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 review

Oocyte maturation triggering in high responders in IVF treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb, nz. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Objective: fertilization (IVF) with GnRH antagonist protocols, using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, clinical trial registries, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted through December 2024. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including high responders, defined by elevated antral follicle count, anti-Müllerian hormone, or estradiol levels. Studies using GnRHa triggers followed by fresh embryo transfer were included only if intensive luteal phase support was provided. Oocyte donation cycles, quasi-randomized designs, and trials lacking outcome data were excluded. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently conducted by two reviewers. Study integrity was evaluated using the TRACT checklist. NMA was performed in STATA (v16), and treatment ranking was based on Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA). Results: Seven high-quality RCTs comprising 632 women were included. There were no significant differences in the number of oocytes retrieved between GnRHa and hCG triggers (mean difference [MD] 1.08, 95% CI -1.06 to 3.22), dual and hCG (MD 0.61, 95% CI -1.53 to 2.74), or GnRHa and dual (MD 1.08, 95% CI -1.06 to 3.22). Similarly, there were no significant differences in mature oocyte yield, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), or miscarriage rate across comparisons. However, GnRHa trigger significantly reduced the risk of moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) compared with hCG (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.82). There were no significant differences in OHSS risk between dual and hCG (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.05-1.64) or between GnRHa and dual (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.05-1.64). Conclusion: GnRHa, hCG, and dual triggers demonstrate similar efficacy in terms of oocyte yield, maturity, and clinical pregnancy rates in predicted high responders. The GnRHa trigger, however, offers a superior safety profile by significantly lowering the risk of OHSS. Larger multicenter RCTs are required to evaluate live birth outcomes and the potential role of the double trigger in this population. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022351423.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Oocyte maturation triggering in high responders in IVF treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Date Crossref
02/04/2026
Éditeur
Frontiers Media SA
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Ovarian function and disordersReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.