Consensus recommendations for malignant histiocytic neoplasms (histiocytic, Langerhans, and interdigitating dendritic cell sarcomas)

Résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT: Malignant histiocytic neoplasms (MHNs) are rare tumors derived from the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), encompassing histiocytic sarcoma, Langerhans cell sarcoma, interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma, and other high-grade MPS lineage tumors. Despite advances in understanding histiocytic neoplasms, MHNs remain diagnostically challenging and lack standardized treatment algorithms. Current classification systems differ in lineage framing and fail to address mixed or ambiguous phenotypes, contributing to diagnostic uncertainty and inconsistent care. To address these gaps, the Histiocyte Society convened an international working group of pathologists and oncologists, including World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification contributors, to harmonize nomenclature, define minimum diagnostic criteria, and develop pragmatic treatment recommendations. Using a modified Delphi process and case-based review, the group formulated >40 consensus statements spanning classification, pathology, molecular testing, clinical evaluation, and therapeutic strategies. Key recommendations include the adoption of a unified MHN designation, use of a minimum immunophenotypic panel, integration of broad molecular profiling, and the documentation of previous hematopoietic malignancy. Treatment algorithms emphasize surgical resection for unifocal disease and targeted therapy or immune checkpoint inhibition for multifocal disease when actionable mutations or programmed death ligand 1 expression are present. These consensus recommendations aim to reduce diagnostic ambiguity, standardize reporting, and improve outcomes for both pediatric and adult patients. Future priorities include international registries to refine risk stratification and biomarker-driven trials exploring targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and combination approaches.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.