Nationwide trends in radiotherapy use among older patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in Japan, 2013–2022
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study examined trends in radiotherapy use among older patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. Using hospital-based cancer registry data (2013–2022), we analyzed 295,662 patients aged ≥ 65 years with epithelial lung tumors (clinical Tis–T2N0M0), excluding those with poorly differentiated endocrine carcinoma or missing treatment data. Overall, 80% underwent surgery, 11% received radiotherapy, and 9% received other management. Radiotherapy use increased from 10.5% in 2013 to 12.8% in 2022 (age- and sex-standardized increase of + 1.2% points). Logistic regression showed increased odds of radiotherapy use in the later period across subgroups according to age, sex, clinical T category, and facility volume, except among patients aged 75–84 years and those treated at high-volume facilities. From 2013 to 2022, radiotherapy use changed by + 1.7, + 0.2, and + 4.5% points among patients aged 65–74, 75–84, and ≥ 85 years, reaching 6.2%, 14.8%, and 35.5%, respectively. Surgery use changed by − 2.1, + 1.3, and − 3.2% points, with values of 89.6%, 76.3%, and 32.8%, respectively. Radiotherapy use increased only modestly, with variation across age groups. Over 30% of patients aged ≥ 85 years underwent surgery, indicating the need to clarify the roles of surgery and radiotherapy in this population.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Nationwide trends in radiotherapy use among older patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in Japan, 2013–2022
- Date Crossref
- 31/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.