Tracing the Legacy of Historical PCB Pollution and Contemporary PAH Contamination in the Kupa River (Danube Basin, Croatia)
Résumé fourni par la source
The Kupa River (Croatia), a tributary of the Danube basin forming part of the Slovenian border, was heavily contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) between 1962 and 1985 due to improper handling and downstream transport via the Krupa and Lahinja rivers. This study evaluated the occurrence, interspecific distribution, and human health implications of PCBs and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in fish (Northern pike, Common carp, Grass carp, Pike-perch, Wels catfish, Bream, and Chub) from the Croatian Kupa River. PCB concentrations were consistently higher than PAH levels across all species. In 30% of samples, Σ6 non-dioxin-like PCBs exceeded the European Commission maximum permissible level for freshwater fish (125 ng⋅g−1 wet weight). Of the 11 PAHs analyzed, only fluoranthene and pyrene were detected. Self-Organizing Map identified distinct pollutant patterns, with chub showing the highest variability and accumulation. PCB concentrations position the Kupa River among moderately to highly impacted European freshwater systems affected by legacy industrial contamination. Health risk assessment, incorporating updated national consumption data, indicates that long-term, uncontrolled consumption of Kupa River fish may pose risks due to PCB exposure, while PAH-related risks appear negligible. These findings highlight the persistence of legacy PCB pollution and the need for integrated sediment–biota monitoring.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Tracing the Legacy of Historical PCB Pollution and Contemporary PAH Contamination in the Kupa River (Danube Basin, Croatia)
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.