Florzolotau (18F) retention is linked to neuropsychological performance in tauopathy
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Florzolotau (18F) positron emission tomography visualizes three- and four-repeat tau isoforms. We aimed to evaluate correlation of tau tracer retention with neuropsychological performance across the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum and non-AD tauopathies. METHODS: This study enrolled 178 patients with cognitive impairment and 60 volunteers. Participants were divided into AD continuum (n = 120) and non-AD tauopathy (n = 98) groups and assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clinical Dementia Rating, Functional Activity Questionnaire, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised Logical Memory, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive subscale, Trail Making Test (TMT), word fluency, and the Japanese Adult Reading Test. Voxel-based analysis was performed. RESULTS: In the AD continuum group, all cognitive test performances significantly correlated with tracer uptake, particularly in the left cortical areas. In the non-AD tauopathy group, strong correlations were observed with MMSE and TMT Part B performance. DISCUSSION: Neuropsychological performance and regional tau pathology distribution are correlated in patients with tauopathy, with differences between AD continuum and non-AD tauopathy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with UMIN Clinical Trials (UMIN-CTR number: 000032027); submitted for registration on March 30, 2018; first patient enrolment was on July 3, 2018.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Florzolotau (18F) retention is linked to neuropsychological performance in tauopathy
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.