Viral Reactivation in Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Anti-BCMA Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy
Rattachement africain : il. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has become a standard of care for many hematological malignancies, and has significantly transformed treatment outcomes. However, CAR-T therapy is associated with specific toxicities, including infections. Although the anti-CD19 CAR-T risks are well-characterized, infectious complications following B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR-T in multiple myeloma (MM) remain under-researched. In this study, we evaluated the incidence and clinical impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and adenovirus (ADV) reactivations in 75 patients receiving anti-BCMA CAR-T for MM, and compared them to 60 patients receiving commercial anti-CD19 CAR-T for B-cell lymphoma (BCL). The viral reactivation rates were 20% for CMV and 8% for EBV in the MM group, vs. 31.7% and 3%, respectively, in the BCL group. No ADV reactivations were seen in either cohort. Most of the CMV reactivations (87% in the MM cohort and 68.5% in the BCL cohort) were asymptomatic and clinically insignificant, and had no impact on progression-free survival (PFS) or overall mortality. Overall, these findings suggest that although CMV and EBV reactivations are relatively common after anti-BCMA CAR-T, they are rarely associated with meaningful disease, and the risks do not exceed those of CD19-directed therapy. Thus, routine pre-emptive screening for these viruses may be unwarranted in asymptomatic patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Viral Reactivation in Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Anti-BCMA Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy
- Date Crossref
- 30/03/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.