Crystal structure of E. coli Nissle 1917 flagellin reveals novel features that modulate bacterial motility but not TLR5 recognition

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract The probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) strain is known to promote intestinal homeostasis via flagellin, the protomer of its motility apparatus, the flagellum. The flagellin of EcN shows atypical features, namely a hypervariable region (HVR), whose structure and significance have remained elusive. We therefore determined the crystal structure of the E. coli Nissle 1917 flagellin FliC at a resolution of 1.2 Å which revealed an unusual domain architecture: the canonical D1 domain was found connected by an extended linker to an extensive HVR whose D2, D3 and D4 domains form an outer domain (OD) which surrounds the filament core comprised of conserved domains D0-D1. Using both recombinant proteins and gene-edited EcN strains expressing mutant flagellins, the functional requirement for these unique features was subsequently studied for effects on immune recognition on intestinal epithelial and immune cells, as well as on flagellar protein expression, assembly and bacterial motility. While human and mouse TLR5 immune recognition of flagellar proteins or intact bacteria was only moderately affected by removal of linker or D4, especially linker removal reduced protein stability and bacterial motility in both soft agar and liquid media swimming assays. Interestingly, depending on the environment, D4 or HVR removal had different effects on motility and surface structure. Finally, a site-directed mutagenesis approach highlighted that loss of TLR5 recognition strictly entails loss of motility but not vice versa. Our data indicate that specific HVRs/OD might be relevant for motility of E. coli Nissle 1917 in specialized environments, but not for immune recognition. Moreover, we find mutational tolerance is greater for immune recognition than for motility, providing new insights into bacterial adaptation to the host environment.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.