Tailoring antiplatelet therapy duration after PFO closure: insights from the PROLONG registry

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Following patent foramen ovale (PFO) device closure, the optimal duration of antiplatelet therapy (APT) remains uncertain. Objectives To evaluate the impact of APT duration on long-term outcomes after PFO closure. Methods This analysis of the PROLONG (PFO Transcatheter Occlusion Long-Term Outcomes National Group) registry included patients with successful PFO closure, no significant residual shunt, and no other indication for chronic antithrombotic therapy. Patients were categorized into short-term (≤12 months) and long-term (>12 months) APT groups. The primary outcome was net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as a composite of ischemic events (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism) and major bleeding (BARC ≥ 3). Results Among 940 patients (mean age 47 ± 12 years, 55% women), NACE occurred in 3.7% of the short-term and 6.3% of the long-term APT groups over a mean follow-up of 14.0 ± 3.1 years (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.33–1.10; p=0.101). The difference was mainly driven by fewer major bleeding events (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.10–0.95; p=0.046). The benefit of short-term APT was evident among patients with a Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score ≥7 (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.12–0.92; p=0.043), but not in those with lower scores (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.41–1.79; p=0.683). Conclusions In patients with RoPE score ≥ 7, discontinuing antiplatelet therapy within 12 months after PFO closure was associated with fewer net adverse clinical events at long-term follow-up.For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.