Statistical Associations Between 3-Hourly Geomagnetic Variations and Psychological Problems in Patients After Open-Heart Surgery During the Period of Lowest Solar-Geomagnetic Activity
Rattachement africain : lt. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of variations in the 3-hourly geomagnetic activity level during the period of the lowest solar and geomagnetic activity on the psychological state of patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery. The study was performed in Kaunas, Lithuania, during 2008–2012. The psychological state of 233 patients was assessed using the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised instrument (SCL-90-R) at 1.5 months, 1 year, and 2 years after the surgery (N = 531). During days of a negative difference between k-index sums at 18:00–00:00 h and 06:00–12:00, all SCL scores were statistically significantly higher. A low k- sum during 18:00–00:00 on the previous day was associated with an increase in anxiety, anger–hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism. The combination of these conditions was associated with higher values of the SCL scores. These effects were observed at 1.5 and 12 months after the surgery. During the period lasting from 18:00 on the previous day to 12:00 on the day of the test, variations in k-indices that were not in line with the general trend of changes in the k-index were associated with a poorer psychological state in patients after open-heart surgery.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Statistical Associations Between 3-Hourly Geomagnetic Variations and Psychological Problems in Patients After Open-Heart Surgery During the Period of Lowest Solar-Geomagnetic Activity
- Date Crossref
- 29/03/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.