Systematic identification of seed-driven off-target effects in Perturb-seq experiments
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Genome-wide Perturb-seq (GWPS) has emerged as a powerful approach for unbiased mapping of gene regulatory networks. A key assumption underlying many Perturb-seq analyses is that each guide RNA exclusively perturbs a single target locus. Without methods to identify and filter off-target events, erroneous gene-pathway associations driven by off-target activity can propagate into downstream analyses. Here, we present a workflow for the systematic identification of candidate off-target events in CRISPRi Perturb-seq experiments. Our approach exploits the observation that cells harboring a guide which represses an off-target gene display transcriptional similarity to cells in which that gene is directly targeted by an on-target guide. We apply our workflow to multiple GWPS datasets and nominate off-target events in which a guide nominally targeting one gene also represses a distinct gene producing a phenotype likely attributable to the off-target perturbation. We use both off-target gene repression and guide seed sequence alignments at the off-target promoter locus as evidence for off-target effects and find independent evidence of putative off-target events in separate GWPS datasets. Together, these results establish a principled framework for the identification and filtering of off-target guide effects in Perturb-seq experiments.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Systematic identification of seed-driven off-target effects in Perturb-seq experiments
- Date Crossref
- 28/03/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.