Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Contemporary Approaches to Surgical, Systemic, and Liver-Directed Therapy
Rattachement africain : us, jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an uncommon but increasingly recognized primary liver malignancy with a poor prognosis. Although surgical resection offers the only realistic opportunity for cure, recurrence is common and the optimal integration of surgery with systemic and liver-directed therapies continues to evolve. Summary: This review summarizes contemporary evidence on the diagnosis and multidisciplinary management of ICC with particular emphasis on surgical, systemic, locoregional, and transplant-based strategies. Cross-sectional imaging plays a central role in staging and assessing resectability including evaluation of vascular invasion and the future liver remnant. Upfront resection is appropriate for selected patients with resectable disease and preserved liver function, with margin-negative resection and lymphadenectomy remaining key oncologic goals. Systemic therapy continues to evolve with cytotoxic chemotherapy forming the backbone of treatment for advanced disease and immunotherapy and targeted agents demonstrating promise in biomarker-defined subgroups. Locoregional modalities such as hepatic arterial infusion therapy and radioembolization may provide disease control in liver-dominant ICC and are increasingly used within a multidisciplinary framework. Liver transplantation remains investigational but may offer favorable outcomes in highly selected early-stage disease.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Contemporary Approaches to Surgical, Systemic, and Liver-Directed Therapy
- Date Crossref
- 27/03/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.