Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Comparing the impact of active floor-rise training with video demonstration on fear of falling and independent floor-rise ability in older adults living in the community: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial

2Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb, sg. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Many older adults cannot rise from the floor independently after a fall, increasing risks of long-lies and reliance on emergency services. OBJECTIVE: Investigate whether floor-rise training (FRT) reduces fear of falling (FoF) and improves floor-rise ability in older adults. DESIGN: Multi-centre, cluster-randomised controlled before-after pilot trial. SETTING: Five community-based Otago exercise classes run by a third-sector organisation. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-one community-dwelling older adults (aged ≥65 years) attending weekly Otago classes were randomised (FRT n = 27, control n = 34). Forty-nine completed to follow-up and were analysed (FRT n = 22, control n = 27). No adverse events occurred. METHODS: Classes were cluster-randomised (3:2 allocation). Intervention: 5 weekly 20-minute FRT sessions utilising backward-chaining. Controls viewed a FRT demonstration video followed by discussion (20-minutes total), without physical practise. Primary outcome: Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Secondary outcomes: timed floor-rise and independent floor-rise ability (from supine, side-sitting, half-kneeling), Perceived Ability to Manage Risk of a Falls or Actual Falls (PAMF), FoF and activity avoidance, measured via visual analogue scales (1-item-question). RESULTS: Primary outcome (FES-I), FoF and activity avoidance showed no significant differences. However, FRT participants significantly reduced floor-rise times compared to controls: supine (13.1 s to 7.1 s, P = .001), side-sitting (8.0 s to 4.6 s, P = .046), and half-kneeling (3.9 s to 1.5 s, P < .001). Post-intervention, 100% of FRT participants could rise from supine versus 63% of controls (P = .007). PAMF scores increased significantly in the FRT group (13.6 to 16.3, P = .033). CONCLUSION: Although FoF did not change, a brief FRT intervention significantly improved floor-rise ability and PAMF. Integrating FRT into fall prevention programmes may reduce long-lie consequences.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparing the impact of active floor-rise training with video demonstration on fear of falling and independent floor-rise ability in older adults living in the community: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
Date Crossref
01/03/2026
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionInjury Epidemiology and PreventionIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.