Evaluation of Intravenous Administration of Anti-Infective Agents and Documentation Quality in Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery: A Quantitative Study on Discrepancies Between Physician Prescriptions and Nursing Records
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Intravenous anti-infectives are an important part of postoperative care, but discrepancies between prescribed and documented administrations remain widespread and require systematic evaluation. Methods: In an exploratory study, prescribed and documented intravenous anti-infective administrations were retrospectively analyzed using patient charts, digital nursing reports and, in cases of deviations, consultations with the responsible staff. The discrepancies were classified into three categories: (I) documentation, (II) administration, and (III) a combination of both. The relationship between discrepancies and dosing interval, time of administration (weekday and shift assignment), and intravenous administration route was statistically analyzed (Χ2 test, residual analysis). Results: Of 5016 anti-infective administrations in 219 patients, 1135 (22.6%) had at least one discrepancy, of which 68.2% (774 of 1135) belonged to category I. Significant differences in the frequency of discrepancies between surgical wards and the dosing intervals were observed. On weekdays, 23.6% of drug administrations (832 of 3519) showed discrepancies compared to 20.2% on weekends (303 of 1497, OR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.05–1.42, p = 0.008). Although the early shift had the lowest administration rate, it showed significantly more discrepancies than expected (313.6 expected vs. 553 observed; adjusted standardized residual +18.1; p < 0.001). Drug administration via the peripheral venous route was more susceptible to discrepancies than the central venous administration route (23.2% [963 of 4149] vs. 19.8% [172 of 867]), OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.01–1.38; p = 0.031). Conclusions: Approximately a quarter of anti-infective administrations were affected by discrepancies, predominantly in category I, with the highest incidences occurring during the early shift and on weekdays. This requires a multi-step improvement program.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evaluation of Intravenous Administration of Anti-Infective Agents and Documentation Quality in Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery: A Quantitative Study on Discrepancies Between Physician Prescriptions and Nursing Records
- Date Crossref
- 27/03/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University Hospital Leipzig pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Leipzig University Hospital Pharmacy pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Medical Faculty Drug Safety Center pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University Medicine Greifswald Department of Neuropediatrics pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
University Hospital Leipzig, Hospital Pharmacy — Leipzig University et Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.