Evaluation of the Single-Tip Bioceramic Filling Procedure in Root Canal Treatment of Maxillary First Molars: A Clinical Study
Rattachement africain : cn, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of the single-tip bioceramic filling method in treating the second mesiobuccal canal (MB2) of maxillary first molars. Ninety-four patients requiring MB2 root canal therapy were randomly allocated to either an experimental group (n = 47) or a control group (n = 47) between January 2023 and December 2024. The experimental group was treated using the single-tip bioceramic technique, whereas the control group received AH-Plus hot vertical compaction. The primary outcome measures included filling quality, procedure time, postoperative pain at 24 hours and 7 days, and clinical efficacy at 6 months. The experimental group demonstrated a significantly higher optimal filling rate (P < 0.05) and shorter mean procedure duration, with comparable clinical success between both groups at 6 months. Additionally, patients in the experimental group experienced lower postoperative discomfort within 24 hours (P < 0.001). Overall, the single-tip bioceramic filling technique achieved equivalent clinical outcomes with improved procedural efficiency and patient comfort compared with the conventional AH Plus vertical compaction method. This simplified technique may represent a safe, effective, and time-efficient approach for MB2 canal obturation in maxillary first molars.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evaluation of the Single-Tip Bioceramic Filling Procedure in Root Canal Treatment of Maxillary First Molars: A Clinical Study
- Date Crossref
- 27/03/2026
- Éditeur
- MyJove Corporation
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.