Chemical and structural characterization of hemicellulose from date fruits (Phoenix dactylifera L.)
Résumé fourni par la source
In this study, we extracted hemicellulose from two date fruit cultivars (soft Barhi and hard Neghal) and investigated their structural, physicochemical, and thermal properties. Alkali solubilized more hemicellulose (45%–47.5%) than DMSO (6%–7%); however, DMSO preserved the feruloyl ester linkages. The monosaccharides constituent of hemicellulose includes xylose (33.1–70.6%), glucose (6.7%–17.2%) uronic acids (5.5%–13.3%), arabinose (3.2%–10.1%), galactose content (4.8%–6.8%), mannose (1.6%–3.6%), and rhamnose (0%–3.1%). The hemicellulose was primarily β –(1 → 4)–linked arabinoxylans with minor glucurono−/galacto-arabinoxylan motifs, together with insoluble glucan and pectic homogalacturonan (HG) and rhamnogalacturonan-I (RG-I). Neghal hemicellulose was structurally simpler, containing relatively less branched arabinoxylan and showing lower peak-molecular weights (27.5–35 kDa), whereas Barhi hemicellulose was enriched in arabinogalactan-protein (AGP) and RG-like features and showed higher peak-molecular weights (29.5–223.9 kDa). These structural differences correlate with a more branched, hydrated and less tightly packed hemicellulose–pectin matrix in Barhi compared with a more dominated arabinoxylan–matrix in Neghal and may contribute to the softer texture of Barhi. Overall, these results provide new insights into the composition and structural diversity of alkali-soluble hemicellulosic polysaccharides in date fruits.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Chemical and structural characterization of hemicellulose from date fruits (Phoenix dactylifera L.)
- Date Crossref
- 26/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.