Manual Insertion of Cochlear Implant Electrodes Versus Robot-Assisted Insertion and Analysis by Micro-CT: A Temporal Bone Study

Résumé fourni par la source

Background/Objectives: Atraumatic electrode array insertion should be targeted in cochlear implantation. Robotic insertion is used in many centers worldwide. Our objective was to evaluate manual electrode placement and robot-assisted placement using RobOtol® on human temporal bones (TBs), in terms of endocochlear trauma and completion of insertion. Methods: Sixteen TBs originating from eight bodies were implanted with Medel-FLEX24 electrodes through the round window. The right TB was implanted manually, while the left TB of the same body was implanted using RobOtol® for electrode insertion. Results were analyzed through micro-computed tomography imaging. No statistical analysis was used, given the small sample size; a descriptive interpretation of micro-CT scans was rather preferred. Results: In the “manual group”, there were two cases (25%) of insertion trauma: elevation of basilar membrane at basal turn (Eshraghi-stage-1). In the “robotic group”, there were two cases (25%) of insertion trauma: one case of elevation of basilar membrane at the middle turn (Eshraghi-stage-1) and one case of dislocation of all electrodes in scala vestibuli (Eshraghi-stage-3). There were six cases (75%) of incomplete insertion in the “manual group” and four cases (50%) of incomplete insertion in the “robotic group”. Conclusions: Both techniques of electrode placement yielded fairly similar results, in terms of endocochlear trauma and completion of insertion. New larger-scale cadaveric and clinical studies are needed to determine the possible benefit of robot-assisted electrode insertion in cochlear implantation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.