Accès ouvert déclaré
2026
article
Model-independent searches of new physics in DARWIN with deep learning
J. Aalbers, K. Abe, M. Adrover, S. Ahmed Maouloud, L. Althueser, D. W. P. Amaral, B. Andrieu, E. Angelino, D. Antón Martin, B. Antunovic, E. Aprile, M. Babicz, D. Bajpai, M Balzer, E. Barberio, L. Baudis, M. Bazyk, N. F. Bell, L. Bellagamba, R. Biondi, Y. Biondi, A. Bismark, C. Boehm, K. Boese, R. Braun, A. Breskin, S. Brommer, A. Brown, G. Bruni, R. Budnik, C. Cai, C. Capelli, A. Chauvin, A.P. Cimental Chávez, A. P. Colijn, J. Conrad, J. J. Cuenca-García, V. D’Andrea, L. C. Daniel Garcia, M. P. Decowski, A. Deisting, C. Di Donato, P. Di Gangi, S. Diglio, M. Doerenkamp, G. Drexlin, K. Eitel, A. Elykov, R. Engel, A.D. Ferella, C. Ferrari, H. Fischer, T Flehmke, M. Flierman, K. Fujikawa, W. Fulgione, C. Fuselli, P. Gaemers, R. Gaior, M. Galloway, F. Gao, N. Garroum, R. Giacomobono, F. Girard, R. Glade-Beucke, F. Glück, L. Grandi, J. Grigat, R. Größle, H. Guan, M. Guida, P. Gyorgy, R. Hammann, V. Hannen, S. Hansmann-Menzemer, N. Hargittai, A. Higuera, C. Hils, K. Hiraoka, L. Hoetzsch, N.F. Hood, M. Iacovacci, Y. Itow, J. Jakob, R. S. James, F. Joerg, F. Kahlert, Y. Kaminaga, M. Kara, P. Kavrigin, S. Kazama, M. Keller, P. Kharbanda, B. Kilminster, M. Kleifges, M. Klute, M. Kobayashi, D Koke, A. Kopec, B. von Krosigk, F. Kuger, L. LaCascio, H. Landsman, R. F. Lang, L. Levinson, I. Li, A. Li, S. Li, S. Liang, Z. Liang, Y. -T. Lin, S. Lindemann, M. Lindner, K. Liu, J. Loizeau, F. Lombardi, J. Long, J. A. M. Lopes, G. M. Lucchetti, T. Luce, Y. Ma, C. Macolino, J. Mahlstedt, B. Maier, A. Mancuso, L. Manenti, F. Marignetti, K. Martens, J. Masbou, E. Masson, S. Mastroianni, A. Melchiorre, J. Menéndez, M. Messina, B. Milosovic, S. Milutinovic, K. Miuchi, R. Miyata, A. Molinario, C. M. B. Monteiro, K. Morå, S. Moriyama, E. Morteau, Y. Mosbacher, J. Müller, M. Murra, J. L. Newstead, K. Ni, C. O’Hare, U. Oberlack, M. Obradovic, I. Ostrowskiy, S. Ouahada, B. Paetsch, Y. Pan, M. Pandurovic, Q. Pellegrini, R. Peres, F. Piastra, J. Pienaar, M. Pierre, G. Plante, T. R. Pollmann, L. Principe, J. Qi, K. Qiao, J. Qin, M. Rajado, D. Ramírez García, A. Ravindran, A. Razeto, L. Sanchez, P. Sanchez-Lucas, G. Sartorelli, A. Scaffidi, J. Schreiner, P. Schulte, H. Schulze Eißing, M. Schumann, A. Schwenck, L. Scotto Lavina, M. Selvi, F. Semeria, P. Shagin, S. Sharma, W. Shen, S. Y. Shi, T. Shimada, H. Simgen, R. Singh, M. Solmaz, O. Stanley, M. Steidl, A. Stevens, A. Takeda, P.-L. Tan, D. Thers, T. Thümmler, F. Tönnies, F. Toschi, G. Trinchero, R. Trotta, C. D. Tunnell, P. Urquijo, M. Utoyama, K. Valerius, S. Vecchi, S. Vetter, G. Volta, D. Vorkapić, W. Wang, K. M. Weerman, C. Weinheimer, M. Weiss, D. Wenz, M. Wilson, C. Wittweg, J. Wolf, V. H. S. Wu, S. Wüstling, M. Wurm, Y. Xing, D. Xu, Z. Xu, M. Yamashita, L. Yang, J. Ye, L. Yuan, G. Zavattini, M. Zhong, K. Zuber
0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés
Le résumé fourni par la source
We present a deep learning pipeline to perform a model-independent, likelihood-free search for anomalous (i.e., non-background) events in the proposed next-generation multi-ton scale liquid xenon-based direct detection experiment, DARWIN. We train an anomaly detector comprising a variational autoencoder (VAE) and a classifier on high-dimensional simulated detector response data and construct a 1D anomaly score to reject the background-only hypothesis in the presence of an excess of non-background-like events. We use simulated validation data to determine the power of the method to reject the background-only hypothesis in the presence of a WIMP dark matter signal, without any model-dependent assumption about the nature of the signal. We show that our neural networks learn relevant features of the events from low-level, high-dimensional detector outputs, avoiding lossy and computationally expensive compression into lower-dimensional observables. Our approach is complementary to the usual likelihood-based analysis, in that it reduces the reliance on many of the corrections and cuts that are traditionally part of the analysis chain, with the potential of achieving higher accuracy and significant reduction of analysis time. We envisage the methodology presented in this work augmenting or complementing likelihood-based and other data-driven methods currently utilized in the DARWIN (and in the future, XLZD) analysis pipeline.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Model-independent searches of new physics in DARWIN with deep learning
- Date Crossref
- 26/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les sujets associés
Dark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesComputational Physics and Python Applications