Aller au contenu principal
2026 conference-abstract

2138 Disparities in Central Cord Syndrome: An Analysis From a National Spinal Cord Injury Database

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Central Cord Syndrome (CCS) is an incomplete spinal cord injury predominantly affecting the cervical region, characterized by greater upper extremity dysfunction than lower extremity. Treatment approaches include surgical decompression and non-surgical management, encompassing spine immobilization, physical therapy, medication, and rehabilitation. While clinical outcomes have been extensively studied, recent research has highlighted racial disparities in the management and outcomes of CCS patients. A study by Deysher et al. revealed that African American patients with CCS experienced delayed surgical decompression compared to their Caucasian counterparts, leading to poorer outcomes. Early decompression has been shown to reduce cord edema and inflammation, thereby improving neurological function and reducing complications such as infections and cardiac issues. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were as follows ASIA motor score <4 or unknown in lower extremities during acute presentation, or ASIA motor score >3 or less than 2 scores with values greater than 3 in the upper extremities. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 29.0. RESULTS: Our findings indicated that African American patients had higher readmission rates within one-year post-discharge compared to Caucasian patients. However, no significant differences were observed in ASIA motor and sensory scores or the Functional independence Measure (FIM) at discharge and one-year follow-up between racial groups. Notably, insurance type influenced outcomes; African American patients with government insurance exhibited lower FIM scores compared to those with private insurance. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that while immediate functional recovery may not differ significantly between races, disparities in readmission rates and long-term outcomes persist, potentially due to factors such as insurance coverage and access to rehabilitation services. Addressing these disparities requires targeted interventions to ensure equitable care and support for all CCS patients.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
2138 Disparities in Central Cord Syndrome: An Analysis From a National Spinal Cord Injury Database
Date Crossref
01/04/2026
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les sujets associés

Spinal Cord Injury ResearchMedical Case Reports and StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.