Renal resistive index and biomarkers of cell cycle arrest in the early diagnosis of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury in rats
Rattachement africain : tr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objective: This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of renal resistive index (RRI) and urinary cell cycle arrest biomarkers for early detection of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) in a rat model using cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Materials and Methods: Sixty female Wistar Albino rats were allocated into six groups (n=10): five CLP groups based on measurement timing (3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours post-procedure) and one sham group. Following CLP, RRI measurements were performed, and blood, urine, and tissue samples were collected before sacrifice. Urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-7 (IGFBP-7) were quantified via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Serum creatinine and lactate levels were measured, and histopathological kidney examination was conducted. Results: RRI increased significantly at six hours (0.44±0.04), peaking at 24 hours (0.73±0.02) post-CLP. The [TIMP-2×IGFBP-7] combination elevated significantly at three hours (P0.45 demonstrated optimal diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 89%, specificity 87%). Conclusions: In this CLP-induced polymicrobial sepsis model, both RRI and urinary cell cycle arrest biomarkers predicted early AKI within similar timeframes, with RRI >0.45 showing superior predictive value.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Renal resistive index and biomarkers of cell cycle arrest in the early diagnosis of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury in rats
- Date Crossref
- 26/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Turkish Society of Intensive Care
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.