MORPHIS (MORPHological Interpretable Signature) captures heterogeneous treatment- and aging-related responses of single cells
Rattachement africain : dk, gr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Cell morphology encodes changes in cytoskeletal and organelle organization during disease, treatment, and aging, yet is often assessed qualitatively or through poorly interpretable feature sets extracted from microscopy images. Here we introduce MORPHIS (MORPHological Interpretable Signature), a machine learning framework on explainable, analytically rich features paired with statistical methodologies for robust and interpretable quantification of single-cell morphological signature. MORPHIS extracts compact, interpretable feature signatures that capture both perturbation-specific response magnitude and heterogeneous cellular responses. It accurately distinguishes treatment-specific morphological signatures of eight mechanistically distinct membrane-active and intracellular-targeting compounds in Caco-2 and HeLa cells elucidating conserved and divergent phenotypic responses among compound-classes, as well as ultrastructural nuclear alterations upon aging of C. elegans and quantifies heterogeneous single-cell fractional responses. By remaining cell-type and perturbation agnostic, MORPHIS provides a generalizable framework for quantifying morphological signatures across diverse biological contexts including pharmacological treatment or aging.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- MORPHIS (MORPHological Interpretable Signature) captures heterogeneous treatment- and aging-related responses of single cells
- Date Crossref
- 25/03/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.