On Time Saves Lives: Survey Insights and Position Statement from the American Epilepsy Society on Barriers to Antiseizure Medication Access
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Rationale: Seizure medication must be taken regularly to be effective; seizures often result from missed doses. Numerous barriers can delay people with epilepsy (PWE) from obtaining medication on time. Methods: Two surveys were designed, one for PWE and their caregivers and one for healthcare providers (HCPs). Surveys were delivered electronically and data analysis was descriptive. Results: Medication unavailability was the most common barrier reported. Additional barriers in order of decreasing frequency included: the message "too soon to refill," insurance coverage, prescription delay, and cost. For non-active drivers, transportation was a barrier. Sequelae of delayed medication access included: stress, emergency medication utilization, and hospitalization. Access to seizure medications was recognized as a problem by 95% of HCP surveyed, most frequently attributed to insurance barriers and cost. Over 10% of HCP reported a patient death from a medication access issue. Conclusion: The American Epilepsy Society's Position Statement on medication access supports reducing obstacles that delay obtaining medication through a multifaceted approach. It recommends elimination of unnecessary regulatory barriers, cost containment and insurance reform, supply chain transparency, practice management guidance, and ongoing research.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- On Time Saves Lives: Survey Insights and Position Statement from the American Epilepsy Society on Barriers to Antiseizure Medication Access
- Date Crossref
- 25/03/2026
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.