Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Microbiological etiology of endogenous and exogenous postprocedural endophthalmitis: a 5-year German federal state study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: To investigate the microbiological etiology of endogenous and exogenous postprocedural infectious endophthalmitis in patients referred to two tertiary eye care centers in the German federal state of Saarland over a five-year period (2019-2023). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all cases of endophthalmitis treated at two ophthalmological centers in southwest Germany between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2023. Included were only those cases for which vitreous aspirate specimens were subjected to microbiological analysis. Cases of exogenous endophthalmitis secondary to other ocular or periocular infections (e.g., microbial keratitis) or trauma were excluded. Microbiological pathogen identification was performed using Gram stain microscopy, conventional bacterial and fungal cultures, as well as broad-range bacterial and fungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by sequencing in PCR-positive samples. RESULTS: A total of 126 endophthalmitis vitreous aspirate samples from 126 patients with a mean age of 73.3 ± 11.4 years were included. The majority of endophthalmitis cases occurred after intravitreal injection (55.6%), followed by previous cataract surgery (23.8%), pars plana vitrectomy (5.6%), and glaucoma surgery (4.8%). Only 7.9% of all cases were endogenous. Overall, pathogens were identified in 58.7% (n = 74) of all cases, with culture yielding a higher detection rate compared to PCR (53.2% versus 43.5%). Staphylococcus epidermidis was most commonly detected (n = 43; 58.1%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n = 7; 9.5%) and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 5; 6.8%). Postinjection and postcataract endophthalmitis tended to be associated with positive bacterial culture results, whereas endogenous endophthalmitis was more frequently associated with negative bacterial culture results (p = 0.06). Fungal endophthalmitis was detected in three samples, of which the endogenous cases were caused by Candida albicans (n = 2). Bacterial multidrug resistance was rare, with only a single detected methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain. All Gram-positive bacteria were susceptible to vancomycin. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm S. epidermidis to be the most common endophthalmitis-causing pathogen. No single microbiological diagnostic technique would have identified all cases of infection, thus calling for combined approaches that include culture and molecular testing.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Microbiological etiology of endogenous and exogenous postprocedural endophthalmitis: a 5-year German federal state study
Date Crossref
25/03/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Ocular Infections and TreatmentsRetinal and Macular SurgeryLegionella and Acanthamoeba research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.