Frostbite: diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and future directions

Le résumé fourni par la source

From cold-weather training to deployments in high altitude and arctic conditions, frostbite injury and its sequelae remain a serious concern in military operations. Frostbite harms tissue in two distinct ways. The first involves ice crystal formation within tissue, resulting in mechanical damage and ischemia. The second occurs secondary to the inflammatory and prothrombotic state caused by reperfusion from rewarming frozen tissue. Frostbite injuries can be classified in a number of ways, but no perfect system exists. Initial work-up and diagnosis are primarily clinical. However, in equipped treatment facilities, advanced imaging modalities such as technetium- 99 m ( 99 mTc) bone scintigraphy, magnetic resonance angiography, single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT), and more can play a role in diagnosis and treatment. In resource-constrained environments, such as the deployed setting, management should involve an algorithmic approach. After concurrent hypothermia and/or trauma have been evaluated for and treated, active rewarming should take place so long as there is no risk of refreezing. During re-warming, surgical consultation and evacuation considerations should be considered. Once evacuated to a definitive treatment facility, thrombolytic as well as other therapies may be indicated. Unless there is evidence of severe damage or infection, surgical management is typically delayed until injury margins are fully demarcated. Longer-term prognosis is dependent on severity, with deeper injuries often resulting in longer hospital stays, more amputations, and chronic disability. Looking forward, future frostbite research should aim to bridge field and hospital care with the goal of minimizing tissue loss and accelerating functional recovery.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.