Review: Antimicrobial stewardship in animal health: Experience-based co-design framework to capture progress and accelerate improvement — R0/PR3
Rattachement africain : au, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is essential for mitigating antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in animal health, but implementing national initiatives is challenging due to diverse influencing factors and the need for context-specific approaches. An Animal AMS Practice Group, comprising individuals with lived experience overseeing AMS in various animal health contexts, was engaged and through an experience-based co-design approach created a comprehensive AMS Framework that captures progress and supports tangible improvements in AMS practices in each context. The Framework supported a cross-sectoral pilot assessment that helped users identify progress, areas for improvement and contextualise antimicrobial usage and AMR data, while also motivating further AMS efforts. Despite common barriers to the sharing of sensitive data, participants willingly shared AMS results for comparison and publication. The process demonstrated that co-design coupled with peer learning and expert support is essential to creating AMS tools that are relatable to users. Several participants incorporated the Framework into routine practice, with some using it to drive sector-level AMS action. The resulting Framework offers an adaptable, scalable entry point for AMS efforts and a platform for setting meaningful improvement goals. It supports broader opportunities for national-level AMS assessments and strategy development.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Review: Antimicrobial stewardship in animal health: Experience-based co-design framework to capture progress and accelerate improvement — R0/PR3
- Date Crossref
- 09/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Type
- peer-review
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.