Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

“Monstros” Taxonômicos do “Novo Mundo”: De como Tatus, Tamanduás e Preguiças Desafiaram o Pensamento Zoológico e Evolutivo do Século XVI Ao XIX

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : br. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

This article discusses the role of Xenarthrans, currently represented by armadillos, sloths, and anteaters, in transforming concepts of “nature” that have evolved since Classical Antiquity. The relevance of this fauna in the scientific revolution, which led to the modern systematic and taxonomic based on phylogeny and evolution, is also highlighted. First, books and reports of the first chronists of “New World” fauna were analyzed. In them, is possible to dimension how this sui generis fauna has impacted a zoological science still growing in Europe. After, it is taken as a case study the Athanasius Kircher” book “Noah’s Ark” (1675). The invention in which Kircher explains the existence of animals once absent in the biblical Ark, including the Xenarthras, shows us, in a particular way, how this “new” fauna has influenced the Natural Philosophy of the period. Finally, the article assesses the role of the extinct Xenarthrans, such as giant sloths and armadillos, on comparative biology developments and the great debates of paleontology and geology of the 18th and 19th centuries. From naturalistic-fantastic descriptions of live Xenarthrans, such as in Hans Staden and André Thevet in the 16th century, to their first fossils studied by Georges Cuvier in Germany and Peter Lund in Brazil of the 18th century, are problematized herein. The consequences of Xenarthrans “discovered” by Europeans to the Natural Philosophy were tremendous, including implications for the posterior consolidation of own natural sciences. The article discusses how the discovery by Western science of these 'taxonomic monsters' was crucial for the epistemology of diferent disciplines, as Comparative Biology, Biogeography, and even for the consolidation of the early Evolutionary Theory. The text also aims to provoke discussion on how studies of the Historical Ecology of groups such as Xenarthra can be important for strengthening and valoration of conservation projects, for the remaining diversity of this important group of ‘New World’ mammals, particularly in the Neotropics.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
“Monstros” Taxonômicos do “Novo Mundo”: De como Tatus, Tamanduás e Preguiças Desafiaram o Pensamento Zoológico e Evolutivo do Século XVI Ao XIX Taxonomic “Monsters” of the “New World”: of how Armadillos, Anteaters, and sloths Challenge the Zoological and Evolutionary thought from the 16<sup>th</sup> to the 19<sup>th</sup> Centuries
Date Crossref
24/03/2026
Éditeur
Historia Ambiental Latinoamericana y Caribena - HALAC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Universidade Federal de São Carlos pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Universidade Federal do Pará pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Universidade Federal de São Carlos et Universidade Federal do Pará.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Evolution and Paleontology StudiesHistory of Science and Natural HistoryEvolution and Science Education

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.