Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

Clinical Criteria for the Definition of Refractory Septic Shock: A Joint Delphi Consensus from the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM)

11Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
93Institutions déclarées
27Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : fr, in, us, dk, ca, se, cl, ie, cz, it, be, il, es, nl, gb, de, gr, tr, jo, sa, br, au, mx, jp, co, Afrique du Sud, nz. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVE: A definition of refractory septic shock is necessary to guide diagnosis, management, prognostication, research, and future guidelines for this most severe form of the disease. We sought to achieve consensus on clinical criteria that would be used to define refractory septic shock. DESIGN: Review of literature, expert panel position statements, and Delphi rounds with an international expert group. SETTING: Consensus was defined as having at least 75% of panellists in agreement or disagreement on the three highest or lowest levels of a 7-point Likert scale or based on responses to single- or multiple-choice questions, respectively. SUBJECTS: A panel of multinational, multiprofessional and multidisciplinary critical care experts assembled by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (57 invitations and 56 participants). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A five-round Delphi process was conducted for consensus and stability. The steering committee proposed 34 statements, and five of them were rejected by panel experts after round 2. Among 29 statements selected from eight domains, consensus was reached for 13. The panel agreed on the need for a comprehensive consensus set of clinical criteria for refractory septic shock. Markers of organ dysfunction (75%, 2 rounds), tissue perfusion (91.1%, 2 rounds) including lactate (94.6%, 2 rounds) and capillary refill time (76.8%, 2 rounds), assessment of fluid-responsiveness after initial resuscitation (92.9%, 5 rounds), and use of vasoactive drugs at norepinephrine equivalents greater than 0.5 µg/kg/min (75.0%, 3 rounds), were selected as clinical criteria of refractory septic shock. The use of critical care ultrasound (CCUS) (92.9%, 3 rounds) was the single diagnostic modality that reached a consensus-based agreement. CONCLUSIONS: A consensus for 13 criteria to frame the definition of refractory septic shock was reached. Refractory septic shock is characterised by persistently elevated lactate concentrations and or prolonged capillary refill time in patients with septic shock who are fluid unresponsive, require a norepinephrine base equivalent dose greater than 0.5 micrograms per kilogram per minute, and undergo CCUS assessment when mixed shock is suspected.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Clinical Criteria for the Definition of Refractory Septic Shock: A Joint Delphi Consensus from the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM)
Date Crossref
24/03/2026
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Aix-Marseille UniversitéHomi Bhabha National InstituteTata Memorial HospitalCleveland ClinicCase Western Reserve UniversityMayo ClinicMayo Clinic in ArizonaMayo Clinic in FloridaUniversity of CopenhagenGentofte HospitalUniversity of Washington Medical CenterHôpital Gui de ChauliacImpactMcMaster UniversityKarolinska University HospitalAlbert Einstein College of MedicineMontefiore Medical CenterPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileCooper University HospitalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de MontpellierHôpital Saint EloiGeorgia College & State UniversityUniversity of GeorgiaSt. James's HospitalUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-YvelinesHôpital Raymond-PoincaréCharles UniversityHumanitas UniversityIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalUniversité Libre de BruxellesCentre Hospitalier Interrégional Edith CavellUniversity of VeronaHebrew University of JerusalemMaccabi Healthcare ServicesUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaVall d'Hebron Hospital UniversitariErasmus MCUniversité de Reims Champagne-ArdenneVita-Salute San Raffaele UniversityIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere ScientificoIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San RaffaeleInsermCentre de Médecine PréventiveUniversité de LorraineNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research CentreUniversité Paris-SaclayBicêtre HospitalSt Thomas' HospitalKing's College LondonHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBury CollegeUniversity College LondonKAT General Hospital of AtticaHacettepe UniversityEmory HealthcareEmory UniversityFeinstein Institute for Medical ResearchDuke UniversityUniversity of California, San FranciscoWake Forest UniversityKing Hussein Cancer CenterNYU Langone HealthUniversity of MichiganMichigan MedicineVA Center for Clinical Management ResearchRegis CollegeUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical SchoolFamily and Social Services AdministrationUniversity of PittsburghKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health SciencesKing Abdullah International Medical Research CenterNational Guard Health AffairsD’Or Institute for Research and EducationUniversidade Federal de São PauloHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São PauloThe Royal Melbourne HospitalUNSW SydneyNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research CentreThe George Institute for Global HealthImperial College LondonRoyal North Shore HospitalHospital Civil de GuadalajaraKameda Medical CenterHospital São PauloFundación Valle del LiliIcesi UniversityUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburg HospitalWellington HospitalMedical Research Institute of New ZealandAtrium Health Wake Forest BaptistOutcomes Research ConsortiumCollaborative Group (United States)

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.