Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after azacitidine and venetoclax salvage in relapsed/refractory AML: a multicenter real-world study by the French AURAML group
Résumé fourni par la source
Fit relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients usually undergo intensive chemotherapy (IC)-based salvage to bridge them to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but their prognosis remains poor. Azacitidine and venetoclax (AZA/VEN) are increasingly used as salvage therapy in R/R AML with encouraging results, although data remain limited. In this study, we evaluated the post-HSCT outcomes of 75 R/R AML patients from the VENAURA registry who underwent HSCT after AZA/VEN salvage. After a median follow-up of 16.9 months, the estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) was 61.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.5-68.1%). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 35.1% (95% CI: 20-50.2%). The estimated 2-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) rate was 10.6% (95% CI: 9.8-23.3%). Cytological response at the end of cycle 1 was independently associated with OS and CIR in multivariate analysis. Comparison with 75 pair-matched patients receiving IC-based salvage prior to HSCT revealed similar OS in both groups. CIR was not significantly higher in AZA/VEN-treated compared to IC-treated patients; however, there was a trend toward a lower 2-year NRM rate in the AZA/VEN group. Our data suggest that AZA/VEN represents a feasible bridge-to-transplant option with a favorable toxicity profile.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after azacitidine and venetoclax salvage in relapsed/refractory AML: a multicenter real-world study by the French AURAML group
- Date Crossref
- 24/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.