Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

729: BRIDGING THE GAP: ANALYZING THE IMPACT OF GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION ON RAPID RESPONSE OUTCOMES

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Rapid response teams (RRTs) are common in hospitals, yet their impact on patient mortality remains debated. While numerous factors influence RRT effectiveness, the geographic location of patients within a hospital has not been widely explored. This study investigates how locations of patients relative to RRTs within a large medical center impact patient mortality. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single academic medical institution. Data was collected from March 1 to August 31, 2024 for patients who underwent a rapid response event. Patient demographics and patient location relative to an RRT base in Tower A were recorded, with locations categorized as Tower A, adjacent Towers B and C, or remote Tower D, located one block away and connected to the main hospital via bridges. Variables extracted from the medical record include times of RRT duration and arrival times. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Variables were compared using two-tailed t-tests and simple logistic regression analysis. Results: Of 903 RRT events, most occurred in Tower A (63.0%), followed by Tower D (28.3%), Tower B (7.1%), and Tower C (1.6%). The longest mean response time was in Tower D (7.6 minutes), followed by Towers C (6.3 minutes), B (5.1 minutes), and A (4.7 minutes). Intervention durations were longest in Tower D (54 minutes), followed by Towers A (44 minutes), C (36 minutes), and B (35 minutes). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 30.8%, with the highest rate in Tower D (48.8%) and lower rates in Towers A (25.3%), B (12.5%) and C (0%). Response times were significantly longer in Towers D and C versus Tower A (p< 0.001 for both), and durations were significantly longer in Tower D versus Tower A (p< 0.001). Logistic regression showed both response time and duration correlated with mortality, but only response time was significantly associated (p=0.003 vs. p=0.113). Conclusions: RRT events that occur farther from the RRT base have longer response times and durations and trend towards higher mortality. While analysis is ongoing to adjust for confounders, our findings emphasize patient proximity to RRTs may indeed affect mortality. This highlights the need to optimize hospital layouts with strategically distributed RRTs to reduce delays in care and improve patient outcomes.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
729: BRIDGING THE GAP: ANALYZING THE IMPACT OF GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION ON RAPID RESPONSE OUTCOMES
Date Crossref
01/03/2026
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Northwestern University Department of Medicine pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Chicago pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution

Department of Medicine — Northwestern University et Chicago.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesDisaster Response and Management

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.