Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 preprint

Nicotine and tobacco product use among US middle and high school students, 2024-25

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Importance The overall prevalence of youth nicotine and tobacco product use has declined over recent years, but the product landscape continues to evolve rapidly, particularly with new disposable e-cigarettes and oral nicotine pouches. Objective To examine changes between 2024 and 2025 in the prevalence of nicotine and tobacco product use among US middle and high school students and describe shifts in product characteristics among current e-cigarette and nicotine pouch users. Design, Setting, and Participants Repeated cross-sectional study using nationally representative data from the 2024 and 2025 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS), a school-based survey of US students in grades 6–12 (approximately ages 11-18). The analytic sample included 29,678 students in 2024 and 23,557 students in 2025. Exposures Survey year (2025 vs 2024). Main Outcomes and Measures Past 30-day use of nicotine/tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, nicotine pouches, cigarettes, and other combustible and non-combustible products. Among current e-cigarette and nicotine pouch users, frequency of use, device type, brands, and flavors were assessed. Results In 2025, 7.2% (95% CI, 6.4-8.2%) of US middle and high school students reported past 30-day use of any nicotine/tobacco product, compared with 8.1% (7.4-8.9%) in 2024. E-cigarettes remained the most commonly used product (5.2%, 4.5-5.9%); 1.7% (1.4-2.1%) used nicotine pouches, 1.7% (1.4-1.9%) smoked cigarettes, and 2.7% (2.4-3.1%) smoked any combustible tobacco product. Among current e-cigarette users, 40.7% (36.7-44.9%) reported frequent use and 27.0% (24.0-30.2%) reported daily use in 2025. Disposable e-cigarette use increased from 55.8% (52.6-59.0%) in 2024 to 66.7% (62.5-70.7%) in 2025, while pod/cartridge device use declined. Flavored product use was reported by 90.0% of e-cigarette users and 88.0% of nicotine pouch users. The most commonly reported brands were Geek Bar among e-cigarette users (61.1%) and ZYN among nicotine pouch users (69.4%). Conclusions and Relevance Overall youth nicotine and tobacco use remains relatively low, but the product landscape is evolving rapidly, with increasing disposable device use and shifting brand preferences. These findings highlight the importance of ongoing, product-specific surveillance to inform public health strategies and regulatory policies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Nicotine and tobacco product use among US middle and high school students, 2024-25
Date Crossref
24/03/2026
Éditeur
openRxiv
Type
posted-content

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • University College London Department of Behavioural Science and Health pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Imperial College London pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • School of Public Health pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Department of Behavioural Science and Health — University College London, Imperial College London et School of Public Health.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Smoking Behavior and CessationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.