Risk of retinal artery occlusion in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: a retrospective cohort study
Rattachement africain : il. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the risk of Retinal Artery Occlusion (RAO) in individuals with Primary-Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) using a large-scale real-world database. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network to analyze electronic health records from 145 healthcare organizations. Adults aged 18 years or older with POAG were compared with non-POAG controls. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed 1:1 on 10 baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was incident RAO occurring from one day after the index POAG diagnosis up to 5 years of follow-up. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to compare RAO-free survival using log-rank tests. RESULTS: After PSM, there were 260,677 patients in each cohort (50.9% female; mean age 68.2 years). POAG patients had a significantly increased risk of RAO compared with controls (3.46 vs. 1.94 per 10,000; HR 2.16; 95% CI, 1.94–2.42; p < .001). The association persisted in sex-stratified and extended follow-up analyses. Anti-glaucoma medications did not significantly alter risk. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale cohort study identifies POAG as an independently associated risk marker for RAO. These findings highlight the importance of vascular risk assessment in POAG management and highlight the need for increased vigilance for retinal ischemic events in this population.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Risk of retinal artery occlusion in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: a retrospective cohort study
- Date Crossref
- 23/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.