Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

International comparison of equity gradients in hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
15Institutions déclarées
9Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ca, au, gb, es, ch, nz, us, fr, fi. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs) are thought to be avoidable with effective preventive care and early disease management, usually delivered in community-based ambulatory care settings. These hospitalizations are both costly and sensitive to the socioeconomic situation of patients. Understanding whether different health systems mitigate the sensitivity of ACSCs to socioeconomic gradients may direct attention to equity-improving approaches to ambulatory health care. This study sought to identify differences in the gradient of Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSC) relative to socioeconomic status across nine countries, namely Australia, Canada, England, Finland, France, New Zealand, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States (US). METHODS: The nine countries participating in the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care (ICCONIC) calculated age—and sex-specific ACSC hospitalization rates between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019, based on data from national data sources on hospitalization and sociodemographic information at small-area levels. We used a common definition of ACSC indicators developed through a literature review of indicators routinely used in healthcare performance monitoring. We employed linear regression models to assess inequalities in ACSC association with area-level socioeconomic deprivation and income using the Slope Index of Inequality and the Relative Index of Inequality. RESULTS: A persistent pattern higher ACSC hospitalization rates for individuals in most disadvantaged areas remained irrespective of the socioeconomic status measure used. There was, however, considerable variation in relative equity gradients in ACSC hospitalizations between countries. Using the nine condition ACSC definition, the greatest inequalities were observed in England (RII = 0.26), and the least inequalities in ACSC hospitalizations were observed in Spain (RII = 0.68) in the 18 + cohort. CONCLUSIONS: A consistent equity gradient in ACSC hospitalizations was observed across high-income countries included in this study. Addressing these inequities with targeted policies can reduce the cost of care while improving access to high quality care.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
International comparison of equity gradients in hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions
Date Crossref
23/03/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Primary Care and Health OutcomesChronic Disease Management StrategiesHealthcare Policy and Management

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.