Possible Self-Arresting Screening Current Stress Damage in a REBCO Test Coil At 42.6 T in 31 T Background Field
Rattachement africain : jp, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
REBCO coated conductors (CCs) have now been optimized for current-carrying capacity in high magnetic fields. Production-length CCs may carry more than 1500 A at 4.2 K/30 T in the B//ab configuration. Such highIcis essential for the construction of new generations of ultra-high field (B > 40 T) magnets. However, highIcalso increases screening current stresses (SCS) and makes these contemporary tapes vulnerable to mechanical damage during magnet operation. To study this vulnerability, we constructed and tested Little Big Coil #6 (LBC6), one of a series of standardized ultra-high field insert coils operated in a 31 T resistive background field at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (NHMFL). LBC6 used contemporary conductor with triple theIcof the earlier LBCs, so we hypothe sized that the coil would be destroyed by SCS during operation. Instead, LBC6 survived multiple quenches from more than 42 T and repeated cycling from 31 T to 41 T. Postmortem analysis revealed plastic deformation throughout the winding pack, but the damage to the REBCO layer was confined to one conductor edge. We propose that this coil exhibited a self-arresting damage mechanism: during the initial energization and quench, SCS damage sufficiently narrowed the superconducting filament width (thus reducingIc) such that no further SCS damage occurred during subsequent operation. Possible implications for ultra-high field magnet design are discussed.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Possible Self-Arresting Screening Current Stress Damage in a REBCO Test Coil At 42.6 T in 31 T Background Field
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.